🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard females from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for additional consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries